Oil analysis testing allows companies to be more assured in their machines and less cautious with their budgets. Using a monitoring system, there is less chance of a serious problem occurring, with little effort needed to manage it. Detecting system weaknesses before they happen is important to any company that wants to stay in operation and reduce repair costs. Condition monitoring should be implemented in any initiative that uses heavy machinery and relies on full uptime of their facilities.
Oil analysis testing sits in two commonly used categories; continuous sensor monitoring and lab analyzed samples. Sensor methods mean that the oil is constantly under surveillance by computer, often with an alarm system to warn for sudden discrepancies. Alternatively, oil can be taken out as a sample and tested for qualities in a lab kit. There are many reasons for a company to use either of these, with the final decision coming down to which is more suitable for the purpose.
Lab samples are helpful for testing oil levels and qualities on a frequent but not continual basis. A jet engine does not have the flexibility allowing it to stay unmonitored for any period of time, especially when airborne, so it may not be an option for some. For those without this worry, a self-contained oil analysis testing lab is great for getting readings on all aspects of oil quality. Labs are precise enough to allow for the pinpointing of specific leaks, contamination sources and machine damage.
It is worth noting that both of these options come with different costs, and this will feed into which oil testing is used. For the most part, companies will simply need a way to take samples and test their viscosity and other parameters. A drawback of this sampling is that values can change drastically between scheduled tests. Those with a need for something more urgent, automated or alarm-triggered will need to pay more for a sensor system.
These two options were created not as alternatives to each other, but as valid ways to move towards the same outcome from new angles. The outlining features of each are that one is a flawless real-time warning system, and the other provides accurate analysis of samples. The choice will be right or wrong based on whether a machine will be ok while not being actively monitored. The cost should also be contemplated, as this will be different depending on the option chosen. One thing both of the oil analysis testing kits have in common is that they are able to predict with stunning accuracy where and how problems are going to occur if left untreated.
Oil analysis testing sits in two commonly used categories; continuous sensor monitoring and lab analyzed samples. Sensor methods mean that the oil is constantly under surveillance by computer, often with an alarm system to warn for sudden discrepancies. Alternatively, oil can be taken out as a sample and tested for qualities in a lab kit. There are many reasons for a company to use either of these, with the final decision coming down to which is more suitable for the purpose.
Lab samples are helpful for testing oil levels and qualities on a frequent but not continual basis. A jet engine does not have the flexibility allowing it to stay unmonitored for any period of time, especially when airborne, so it may not be an option for some. For those without this worry, a self-contained oil analysis testing lab is great for getting readings on all aspects of oil quality. Labs are precise enough to allow for the pinpointing of specific leaks, contamination sources and machine damage.
It is worth noting that both of these options come with different costs, and this will feed into which oil testing is used. For the most part, companies will simply need a way to take samples and test their viscosity and other parameters. A drawback of this sampling is that values can change drastically between scheduled tests. Those with a need for something more urgent, automated or alarm-triggered will need to pay more for a sensor system.
These two options were created not as alternatives to each other, but as valid ways to move towards the same outcome from new angles. The outlining features of each are that one is a flawless real-time warning system, and the other provides accurate analysis of samples. The choice will be right or wrong based on whether a machine will be ok while not being actively monitored. The cost should also be contemplated, as this will be different depending on the option chosen. One thing both of the oil analysis testing kits have in common is that they are able to predict with stunning accuracy where and how problems are going to occur if left untreated.