When you think about it, almost every home could benefit from a water purifier.
It's a simple equation: they are low cost items, and our water is often high in harmful contaminants.
Perhaps this is why the simple home water purifier is being installed in more and more homes.
The numbers of purifiers installed already must be huge, because worldwide the water purification industry is said to be worth $400 billion.
But it is getting bigger.
Just in China alone, for example, the government has allocated $125 billion on water treatment and water recycling over the next five years.
And in the US we are set to face bills of $1 trillion over the next 20 years to replace public water systems that are getting old and unsafe.
Yet, even with all this investment in community water infrastructure, our drinking water is not always safe.
Local suppliers can cut corners, and inefficient systems are frequently installed.
The result is water from the faucet that is not only unhealthy, it actually looks gray and unsafe! Then there's the invisible harmful compounds that find their way into the aging, sometimes inadequate, community supplies.
Like pesticides.
There are over 30,000 pesticides in the market, made from around 600 compounds, many of which are known to cause cancer and birth defects, and yet the law requires that water authorities only test for six of these compounds in local water supplies.
An earlier report by the influential and rigorous Environmental Working Group shows the effect of this laxity.
It found herbicides had gotten into the drinking water of almost all 29 cities and towns it monitored.
And in 18 of them, herbicide levels were greater than the Federal safety guidelines.
Another survey, just to make the point that lax standards are common, in Milwaukee showed 400,000 people ill in one month (And 100 of them so ill they died!) to outbreaks of chlorine resistant parasites in city water supplies Local authorities frequently cannot be relied on to give us the pure water we need.
It's no wonder people would consider a hoe purifier water system.
At least that way they can look after their water themselves! Bottled water is another option people mention "around the water cooler" when the poor quality of water from the faucet comes up.
But while water from a bottle would seem an easy option, since unscrewing a bottle cap is about as easy as it gets, drinkers need to make sure the bottler they buy from can be trusted.
Astonishingly, a four-year long study by the Natural Resources Defense Council found of "103 brands surveyed, one-third contained levels of contamination.
" This adds some push to the allegation I see on the Internet that a lot of bottled water simply comes from the faucet in the bottling plant! My own family used a home water purifier for 10 years when we lived in a developing country, Pakistan.
It was great.
Water went in brown and came out clean and pure.
When you're looking for a home purifier water system you will soon realize there are basically two options.
Purifiers based around reverse osmosis and others built on a filtration system.
A reverse osmosis home water purifier appears at a casual glance to be the better of the two.
Because it gets rid of everything in the water.
But when you think about t, "everything" means just that -- everything is removed.
Everything including the trace minerals.
These minerals are known to be essential to maintaining our life even though they are found in the body in very small (trace) quantities.
The main ones are cobalt, copper, iodine, manganese, molybdenum, zinc, selenium, chromium and tin.
It is all very well to get rid of pesticides and toxins in our water, but we need to keep nourishing trace minerals.
And a home water purifier system built around reverse osmosis jettisons them.
So look for a purification system based on filtration techniques.
They remove contaminants like pesticides and feces, but leave the naturally occurring minerals we must have.
To my mind the only home purifier to consider would use a filtration system.
But you need to get on Google and prove that for yourself.
It's a simple equation: they are low cost items, and our water is often high in harmful contaminants.
Perhaps this is why the simple home water purifier is being installed in more and more homes.
The numbers of purifiers installed already must be huge, because worldwide the water purification industry is said to be worth $400 billion.
But it is getting bigger.
Just in China alone, for example, the government has allocated $125 billion on water treatment and water recycling over the next five years.
And in the US we are set to face bills of $1 trillion over the next 20 years to replace public water systems that are getting old and unsafe.
Yet, even with all this investment in community water infrastructure, our drinking water is not always safe.
Local suppliers can cut corners, and inefficient systems are frequently installed.
The result is water from the faucet that is not only unhealthy, it actually looks gray and unsafe! Then there's the invisible harmful compounds that find their way into the aging, sometimes inadequate, community supplies.
Like pesticides.
There are over 30,000 pesticides in the market, made from around 600 compounds, many of which are known to cause cancer and birth defects, and yet the law requires that water authorities only test for six of these compounds in local water supplies.
An earlier report by the influential and rigorous Environmental Working Group shows the effect of this laxity.
It found herbicides had gotten into the drinking water of almost all 29 cities and towns it monitored.
And in 18 of them, herbicide levels were greater than the Federal safety guidelines.
Another survey, just to make the point that lax standards are common, in Milwaukee showed 400,000 people ill in one month (And 100 of them so ill they died!) to outbreaks of chlorine resistant parasites in city water supplies Local authorities frequently cannot be relied on to give us the pure water we need.
It's no wonder people would consider a hoe purifier water system.
At least that way they can look after their water themselves! Bottled water is another option people mention "around the water cooler" when the poor quality of water from the faucet comes up.
But while water from a bottle would seem an easy option, since unscrewing a bottle cap is about as easy as it gets, drinkers need to make sure the bottler they buy from can be trusted.
Astonishingly, a four-year long study by the Natural Resources Defense Council found of "103 brands surveyed, one-third contained levels of contamination.
" This adds some push to the allegation I see on the Internet that a lot of bottled water simply comes from the faucet in the bottling plant! My own family used a home water purifier for 10 years when we lived in a developing country, Pakistan.
It was great.
Water went in brown and came out clean and pure.
When you're looking for a home purifier water system you will soon realize there are basically two options.
Purifiers based around reverse osmosis and others built on a filtration system.
A reverse osmosis home water purifier appears at a casual glance to be the better of the two.
Because it gets rid of everything in the water.
But when you think about t, "everything" means just that -- everything is removed.
Everything including the trace minerals.
These minerals are known to be essential to maintaining our life even though they are found in the body in very small (trace) quantities.
The main ones are cobalt, copper, iodine, manganese, molybdenum, zinc, selenium, chromium and tin.
It is all very well to get rid of pesticides and toxins in our water, but we need to keep nourishing trace minerals.
And a home water purifier system built around reverse osmosis jettisons them.
So look for a purification system based on filtration techniques.
They remove contaminants like pesticides and feces, but leave the naturally occurring minerals we must have.
To my mind the only home purifier to consider would use a filtration system.
But you need to get on Google and prove that for yourself.