3 Misconceptions People Have If They Think the European Commission Isn"t Encouraging Bioenergy
It is important for nations to decide together what to do.
Naturally, it is also important to work together between nations with a common need to decide upon the best the way in which to do it.
However, that's only part of the picture; it is important, but it is not sufficient.
You also need to find out what NOT to do; what mistakes to circumvent.
For that reason you ought to discover a number of the common errors we think are in danger of being made by politicians and the UK public, and then make efforts to avoid them.
That applies to the area of renewable energy, and the criticisms of many people in the UK who say there are not many benefits from the UK's membership of the EU.
But the author believes that there are many people who are succeeding in the area of EU renewable energy policy.
Would you like to be one of those who understands, instead of someone who makes mistakes about this? Then read on.
Three of the most typical errors that folks make with the criticisms of many people of the European Commission in the UK are listed below: First and foremost.
The European Commission has stated that it wishes to bring to commercial maturity the most promising technologies for advanced biofuels and highly efficient combined heat and power from biomass (large scale and sustainable production).
Why this is very important is that these hitherto largely unused energy sources, such as municipal solid wastes and manures, will help to wean the EU and the UK off excessive dependence on oil for their energy supply.
Before avoiding this concern you should think very carefully how our economy will fair if, without new nuclear power plants, all possible other energy sources, of which the UK is in dire need, are not developed to their maximum to avoid power cuts on rotation for a period of years.
Secondly, the European Industrial Bioenergy Initiative (EIBI) has set a general objective for at least 14% of the EU energy mix will be from cost-competitive, sustainable bioenergy by 2020.
This is a crucial factor because there are a lot of constraints which are acting against implementation of bio-energy projects throughout the UK right now and support at all government levels is much needed.
What you should do then is take note, get involved and encourage UK politicians to support the European Commission and UK industry in meeting this goal, as planned.
And finally, many people have been saying that there is not much oil saving from bio-energy projects using energy crops, but, in fact the EU study group is quoted as saying that: Biomethane (as compressed natural gas): from maize gives:
D) * EU cultivation ** data for dry manure That's a whopping official 60% saving on fossil fuel! This issue happens when negative data on the benefits of bio-energy crops gets published and quoted.
The best way to avoid being taken along with the crowd when the majority take the wrong view, is to appreciate the work done by the EU commission, and value their official data.
You'll want to very carefully stay away from these kinds of errors which form part of the many criticisms made by many people in the UK, who say there are not many benefits from the uk's membership of the EU.
We suggest that a better alternative is to stick to the recommendations earlier mentioned, for doing it correctly.
The nations of the EU will then be able to obtain much better results.
Naturally, it is also important to work together between nations with a common need to decide upon the best the way in which to do it.
However, that's only part of the picture; it is important, but it is not sufficient.
You also need to find out what NOT to do; what mistakes to circumvent.
For that reason you ought to discover a number of the common errors we think are in danger of being made by politicians and the UK public, and then make efforts to avoid them.
That applies to the area of renewable energy, and the criticisms of many people in the UK who say there are not many benefits from the UK's membership of the EU.
But the author believes that there are many people who are succeeding in the area of EU renewable energy policy.
Would you like to be one of those who understands, instead of someone who makes mistakes about this? Then read on.
Three of the most typical errors that folks make with the criticisms of many people of the European Commission in the UK are listed below: First and foremost.
The European Commission has stated that it wishes to bring to commercial maturity the most promising technologies for advanced biofuels and highly efficient combined heat and power from biomass (large scale and sustainable production).
Why this is very important is that these hitherto largely unused energy sources, such as municipal solid wastes and manures, will help to wean the EU and the UK off excessive dependence on oil for their energy supply.
Before avoiding this concern you should think very carefully how our economy will fair if, without new nuclear power plants, all possible other energy sources, of which the UK is in dire need, are not developed to their maximum to avoid power cuts on rotation for a period of years.
Secondly, the European Industrial Bioenergy Initiative (EIBI) has set a general objective for at least 14% of the EU energy mix will be from cost-competitive, sustainable bioenergy by 2020.
This is a crucial factor because there are a lot of constraints which are acting against implementation of bio-energy projects throughout the UK right now and support at all government levels is much needed.
What you should do then is take note, get involved and encourage UK politicians to support the European Commission and UK industry in meeting this goal, as planned.
And finally, many people have been saying that there is not much oil saving from bio-energy projects using energy crops, but, in fact the EU study group is quoted as saying that: Biomethane (as compressed natural gas): from maize gives:
- cultivation = 20 gCO2eq/MJ
- transport = 2 gCO2eq/MJ
- processing = 11 gCO2eq/MJ
D) * EU cultivation ** data for dry manure That's a whopping official 60% saving on fossil fuel! This issue happens when negative data on the benefits of bio-energy crops gets published and quoted.
The best way to avoid being taken along with the crowd when the majority take the wrong view, is to appreciate the work done by the EU commission, and value their official data.
You'll want to very carefully stay away from these kinds of errors which form part of the many criticisms made by many people in the UK, who say there are not many benefits from the uk's membership of the EU.
We suggest that a better alternative is to stick to the recommendations earlier mentioned, for doing it correctly.
The nations of the EU will then be able to obtain much better results.