It seems that many believe that we need to "conceive ways to get nations together to ratify new rules the majority of each countries residents or people will make.
Their rulers, dictators, warlords, or religious leaders will then have to bow for this worlds main population to make some basic rules they want to live by, and Enforced by a world-wide enforcement team or organization," as an acquaintance recently mentioned to me.
Of course, the whole concept of a one-world or one-united-planet government is met with resistance by all nations, as no one want to release control or sovereignty to another or another level of authority.
And really as Americans, who love liberty, freedom, and strength of the individual, that's about the last thing we'd go for right? Sure, after all we own our government, a government for the people and by the people, as it is often recited.
Now then, here is another concept; We could create a franchise network, where each nation agree too, based on the best and most successful government strategies to date, with regional variation.
Each nation would have to ratify this agreement to become a member nation-state.
However, the enforcement onto the nation by a World Organization would require those members to give up some control, and some sovereignty which is undoable in the present period, it could only be part of a long-term plan, such a move too quickly would be chaos.
"Franchise the World" so to speak, and just like the US is a group of states, the world would be a group of countries or nation-states.
I realize this is needed for each human to enjoy their life experience, and to stop economic enslavement, Machiavellian rule, promote women's rights, etc.
It does appear this is already happening slowly around the world, still the problem is that many of the past period schemes of civilization rule have failed, and I only know of one I can trust, this one - and only on even days.
The other problem and challenge is that people do not wish to be enforced, and rulers, especially iron-fisted ones are guaranteed not to yield quietly.
Well, those are some thoughts on top of yours, and realize as Americans we've always had a problem with anyone telling us what to do, or how to live here, and I suspect we are not alone in that strong an unmovable stance.
See that point? So the whole one-world government issue is fairly un-American, and doubtful it would be accepted without a hard core challenge.
Unless maybe it was our model of government and organization which was used to unite this planet? I hope you please consider all this.